In the autumn of 2025, Gerald Bourguet found himself living what he considered the ideal life. He and his wife had recently become homeowners with a pool, welcomed a new baby boy, and he was enjoying a career in sports journalism, covering professional men’s basketball. However, his life took a drastic turn following a series of social media posts he made criticizing Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist, after Kirk was shot and killed on September 10 at Utah Valley University.
Consequences of Speaking Out
Bourguet’s posts, which described Kirk as “evil” and critiqued his life’s work as promoting hate, quickly gained traction online. He also criticized Kirk’s supporters for their silence on school shootings. These comments led to his termination, the public exposure of his address, and threatening messages, forcing his family to relocate with their infant son. Despite these challenges, Bourguet maintains he doesn’t regret his comments, acknowledging the significant impact on his life but standing by his beliefs.
PHNX Sports, Bourguet’s former employer, did not comment on the situation. Bourguet’s experience is part of a broader trend where hundreds faced job consequences for voicing critical opinions about Kirk after his death. Some have been reinstated or compensated, while others, like Bourguet, must rebuild their lives from scratch.
Public and Political Reactions
The backlash against critics of Kirk was swift and intense, with many on social media and in political circles calling for repercussions. Influential figures like Laura Loomer and Vice-President JD Vance encouraged actions against those expressing joy over Kirk’s death. Vance urged people to “call out” and contact the employers of those celebrating the assassination.
The response from some conservative leaders, who had previously criticized “cancel culture,” was seen as hypocritical by their opponents. Republican Jordan Pace argued that shaming individuals who celebrated Kirk’s murder was an appropriate societal response. President Donald Trump amplified this stance by sharing Pace’s posts.
Legal Battles and Settlements
Following Kirk’s death, numerous lawsuits have been filed by individuals arguing that their dismissals violated free speech rights. Some cases have resulted in substantial settlements, with figures reaching into the millions. For instance, anthropologist Tamar Shirinian received $1.9 million from the University of Tennessee, while Darren Michael was reinstated and compensated by Austin Peay State University.
However, many private sector employees, like Bourguet, lack the legal protections afforded to public or unionized workers, making their legal battles more challenging. Despite some legal victories, individuals like biologist Brittney Brown express dissatisfaction, noting the disruption and waste of taxpayer money involved in these cases.
Reflecting on the Aftermath
As Bourguet navigates his new reality, he struggles to find employment in sports journalism and has started a podcast, though he doubts it will provide financial stability. He contemplates moving abroad, reflecting on the personal and professional costs of his actions. Despite the consequences, he and others who spoke out against Kirk stand by their right to express their opinions.
While some, like Shirinian, have expressed regret over the tone of their comments, they do not regret the sentiment behind them. Bourguet, too, acknowledges the repercussions on his family and career but remains firm in his belief in the importance of speaking against messages rooted in hate.
