As electric vehicles gain momentum in India, Japanese manufacturers have taken a measured approach compared to their Indian counterparts. Honda entered the market in 2025 with two electric scooters that, despite their innovative features, struggled to gain traction due to specific limitations. Suzuki followed a similar path by developing its own platform, but its e-Access scooter is perceived as costly for its features. In contrast, Yamaha opted for a partnership with an Indian startup to introduce the more budget-friendly EC-06, essentially a refined version of the River Indie. This gives consumers two distinct Japanese electric scooter options, each with its own unique attributes. The critical question is which scooter offers better value for money and how they compare against other market players.
Design and Riding Comfort
Both scooters are designed to stand out with unconventional aesthetics. During a two-week trial, the Yamaha EC-06 garnered more admiration for its bold, squared-off design. The Suzuki e-Access, with its distinctive double duck-bill nose and flowing panels, has a more polarizing appearance.
When it comes to riding comfort, the e-Access offers a more traditional scooter feel. Despite its compact size, it accommodates taller riders comfortably, and its 765mm seat height is approachable for shorter individuals. On the other hand, the EC-06 feels roomier, catering well to taller riders while maintaining a manageable 770mm seat height for shorter users, although a higher seat might benefit taller individuals.
Performance and Handling
The riding dynamics of the two scooters highlight different engineering philosophies. The 122kg e-Access is agile and responsive, sometimes too much so due to its vertically mounted battery under the seat. This also affects the scooter’s compact feel, especially noticeable during U-turns for taller riders. Its ride leans towards firmness, akin to the Burgman, unlike the plush TVS iQube.
The EC-06, although heavier, offers stability with its larger 14-inch wheels. Its suspension effectively absorbs road imperfections, though sharp impacts can cause slight fork judder. However, the seat design could be improved, as its forward slope and soft padding lead to discomfort over longer rides.
Braking and Storage
Neither scooter features ABS, a notable omission given their price tags. The EC-06 boasts confident braking with powerful yet non-aggressive brakes and wider tyres for better traction. Conversely, the e-Access has overly sharp brakes that require careful handling, particularly on slippery surfaces.
In terms of storage, the Yamaha offers a 24.5-litre under-seat compartment, which, while not leading in its segment, is more practical than the Suzuki’s 17-litre space. The e-Access’s battery position limits storage, making it less competitive against rivals like the Rizta and Chetak. Both scooters come with a dedicated charger bag, a thoughtful addition to protect the charger during transport.
Range and Charging
Range remains a crucial factor for electric scooters. In performance mode, the e-Access manages over 88km on a single charge, respectable given its smaller 3kWh battery using LFP chemistry. However, it falls short compared to market leaders. The EC-06, tested in Standard mode, covers 114km, surpassing initial estimates. Both scooters provide honest range indicators, with Eco mode extending range without compromising urban usability.
Charging times differ significantly. The EC-06 requires ten hours with its 480W charger, whereas the e-Access takes about six hours with a 600W charger, though its battery is smaller.
Overall Value
When compared directly, the Yamaha EC-06 emerges as the more favorable choice due to its superior performance, comfort, and range, all at a lower price than the e-Access. However, in the broader market context, both scooters face stiff competition. Priced at Rs 1.71 lakh for the Yamaha and nearly Rs 2 lakh for the Suzuki, they are on the higher end of the spectrum. With other brands offering similar or better features at lower prices, the Japanese models may appeal mainly to brand-conscious consumers. For most, the more competitively priced domestic options remain the smarter choice.
